Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Know Your Rights | Is it legal to video record the police? (The short answer is, yes)

A troubling trend has been cropping up across the nation recently: the arrest of bystanders for the "crime" of video recording on-duty police officers.

Often using a cell phone or camera, people in several cities (Boston, Albany, Chicago) have attempted to record police engaging in legally-dubious behavior, only to have their recording devices smashed or confiscated, and themselves handcuffed and charged with felonies carrying 5-year prison sentences.

The court cases and outcry from civil liberties groups that have resulted from these incidents have raised the question of whether recording the police should be considered a protected right under the First Amendment guarantee of free speech.

Most of the arrests that the police have made in this vein have been under "illegal wiretapping" and "secret eavesdropping" laws, contending that a citizen who records them conducting police business is violating their rights to privacy.

By and large, however, the courts have decided against the police in these instances and have upheld the legality of recording police activity that occurs in public venues.

In general, the question revolves around whether or not the recording was being done "secretly," or openly, so that the person being recorded was aware of it.  In many states it is not illegal to record someone without their consent or knowledge, while other states explicitly prohibit this.

To find out the relevant laws governing the recording of another person (including police) in your state, see the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press's "State-by-State Guide", which provides summaries of the relevant "wiretapping" laws for each of the fifty states.

As a general rule of thumb, however, it is best to follow these simple steps to ensure that when you record the police, you will be engaging in legally and constitutionally protected activity.

1) Record the police in a public location.  The laws governing the recording of another person on private property are much more complex and difficult from the standpoint of the person doing the recording.

2) Do not conceal the fact that you are recording the police. In fact, make it obvious!  In every state in the country, it is legal to record another person in a public location as long as they are aware that you are doing so (i.e., it is not being done "secretly").  This is very important, as is evidenced by the following case, referenced by the Citizen Media Law Project:
In a recent case, a political activist was convicted of violating the wiretapping statute by secretly recording video of a Boston University police sergeant during a political protest in 2006. The activist was shooting footage of the protest when police ordered him to stop and then arrested him for continuing to operate the camera while hiding it in his coat. As part of the sentencing, the court ordered the defendant to remove the footage from the Internet. From this case, it is clear that you can violate the statute by secretly recording, even when you are in a public place.
In contrast to the above case, there is a more recent case of a Boston law student who was arrested in 2007 for recording the police harassing and assaulting a man on the Boston Common.  However, in this situation, all charges were dismissed against the law student, making this court decision an important precedent in securing the right for Massachusetts citizens to record police in public locations, as long as the recording is being done "openly" and in a way that would be deemed "obvious to a reasonable person."

The actual wording of the court ruling in this latter case can be accessed here.  Additionally, if interested, one can click here to access the court filing on behalf of the law student who is now suing the police for violating his civil rights.   
 
To view the exact Massachusetts law on "illegal wiretapping," which covers the act of recording another person, you can see it here.  It is also worth checking out the Citizen Media Law Project's section on Massachusetts Recording Law

---

Finally, it is worth stepping back and wondering what is behind these police attacks on concerned bystanders who take it upon themselves to observe the police.  With the increasing prevalence of camera-phones and the technological advances for rapid, mass dissemination of video via services such as YouTube, the last several years has seen a veritable explosion of videos circulating on the internet, capturing cops engaging in police brutality, illegal activity, and so on.

It is therefore no surprise that police engaged in suspect activities would begin keeping an eye out for anyone who may be recording them.  The ability for the police to abuse their power and act with that oh-so-common arrogant air of omnipotent impunity (not to mention the downright racist, sexist, homophobic, and bigoted actions the police regularly engage in), turns upon the extent to which they exist outside of the public eye.

If more citizens get in the habit of recording police as they engage in such activities, it has the potential to lead to the police actually being held accountable for those things they had grown accustomed to regularly getting away with.

This is what is behind the growth of police attacking bystanders who attempt to document their misconduct; it is nothing more than pure-and-simple scare tactics and bullying.

But this is also why it is so important to fight against police attempts to crack down on free speech.  If we can't record their abuses, it makes it all the easier for the police to get away with committing those abuses. 

It is in this spirit that I offer this article as a resource for people to use in asserting their First Amendment rights to "observe and report" police misconduct, wherever it may occur.

13 comments:

  1. Massachusetts is a very controlling state!! Since I moved here a few months ago from N.Y I'm disgusted on how things are done here. This state is not for the people. Also, as long as someone makes it know to the officer they arre recording than it should be fine? If so, I'm surprised Ma, hasnt found a way to remove this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fuck the police!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do not conceal the fact that you are recording the police. In fact, make it obvious?
    So the police have to know they are being recorded, so they can be on their best behavior?
    If they are a public servant and doing their job in PUBLIC, why should it matter?
    so when the officer tells you to shut off the camera or you're going to jail, and you comply to avoid jail, he's able to do and say what ever he wants. because your evidence was forcibly shutoff. your word vs. his, he wins. But a back-up concealed camera would prove you are right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Completely agree. American citizens, the ones who are paying for them to do their jobs in the first place, should be allowed to video tape them as they perform their duties for us... known or not. Next time a cop uses his dash-cam as evidence in a case, I hope the defendant pleads he or she didn't know they were being recorded. "Privacy violation, privacy violation!! If I knew I was being recorded I wouldn't have broken the law!!" And they are supposed to be upholding it, not hiding behind loopholes in it :/

      Delete
  4. This is simple, when a police officer pulls you over, its legal for them to record you. And then even put that video on public such as the show COPS. So why would it be illegal for us to do the same back?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True amen my brother WE THE PEOPLE need to fight back!!

      Delete
  5. Very informative post. Always one of those topics that is debated quite heavily. I work with a video production company, so it seem like I always have a recording device on me. Good to know for the future.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Video deposition is always responsible services of court reporting company. It helps in legal issues .
    thanks
    Legal Videographer

    ReplyDelete
  7. The process of knowing who the owner of a piece of property is can be done through a public records search. Of course this process is usually lengthy and can take some time to complete when doing so on your own. The best option is to use Property Ownership Record which can carry out the required actions for you.

    ReplyDelete